In our first instalment, we explored the initial foundations for an AI-ready knowledge base by:
-
Exploring and Structuring Your Data (Step 1) – creating a comprehensive content inventory and defining schema.
-
Understanding User Needs (Step 2) – aligning your knowledge base structure with real-world behaviors through user interviews and surveys.
These two steps ensure your knowledge base is built on solid ground, both in terms of content clarity and user relevance. Now, it’s time to tackle the next two steps, which focus on translating your structured data into an optimized retrieval system and harnessing the expertise of domain specialists to ensure quality and accuracy.
Step 3: Metadata Enrichment, Chunking & Indexing
After you’ve mapped out your data sources and validated user needs, the next major milestone is to design and implement an indexing strategy that will power both search and AI-driven Q&A. This involves creating a hybrid index that uses traditional lexical search (BM25) and semantic search (dense vectors or embeddings). You’ll also need to enrich your documents with metadata and “chunk” them into manageable sections to maximize retrieval accuracy.
Why Metadata and Hybrid Indexing Matter
-
Metadata provides critical contextual clues for efficient filtering and faceted search. If you can narrow down a user’s query by department (e.g., “Engineering” vs. “Sales”), project ID, or version number, your search engine can drastically reduce the time to locate the correct documents.
-
Hybrid Indexing combines lexical and semantic approaches.
-
Lexical search uses methods like BM25 or TF-IDF to find exact term matches—vital for error codes, file names, or highly specific jargon.
-
Semantic search complements lexical retrieval by interpreting the meaning behind queries and documents through embeddings.
-
By blending both, your system captures more relevant matches while still excelling at pinpointing exact or highly technical terms.
Practical Steps
Metadata Extraction and Enhancement:
Programmatically extract metadata such as titles, authors, creation dates, keywords, section names, modification dates, or any domain-specific tags (e.g., "Engineering," "Sales," "Internal vs. External," product version numbers). To enhance metadata you can use a LLM to quickly derive other relevant parameters, such as summaries, topic segmentation, etc.
Document Chunking:
-
Break down documents into smaller chunks of text (typically 200-500 tokens or depending on the domain: paragraphs)
-
Maintain context by including relevant metadata with each chunk
Quick tip: Adopt the contextual retrieval technique proposed by Anthropic.
Building a Hybrid Index:
A hybrid index blends lexical and semantic retrieval. By preparing separate indexes for each, then fusing results, you maximize your retrieval capabilities.
-
Lexical Index (BM25 or TF-IDF)
-
Precision on Keywords: Perfect for exact matches of error codes, method names, or certain acronyms.
-
Implementation Tools:
-
OpenSearch, Apache Solr, or Elasticsearch for robust full-text capabilities.
-
Azure Cognitive Search if you’re heavily invested in Microsoft’s Azure ecosystem.
-
-
-
Semantic Index (Vector Embeddings)
-
Context & Synonym Recognition: Key for capturing nuanced relationships in user queries like “How to integrate with a marketing analytics tool.”
-
Implementation Tools:
-
Extensions in Solr or OpenSearch that support dense vectors.
-
Dedicated vector databases like Pinecone, Milvus, or Weaviate if your project is heavily reliant on high-dimensional embeddings or multi-modal data.
-
Cloud-based vector services from providers such as AWS (OpenSearch + KNN plugin) or GCP (Vertex AI Matching Engine).
-
-
-
Rank Fusion
-
Combining Scores: Use reciprocal rank fusion or weighted scoring to merge lexical and semantic matches.
-
Deduplication & Diversity: If both indexes produce overlapping results, deduplicate while ensuring you don’t lose beneficial variety in the final ranked list.
-
-
Metadata-Driven Filtering
-
Use your structured metadata to filter out irrelevant documents before you perform an expensive similarity search on vectors.
-
For example, if the query pertains to “version 2.0,” exclude documents tagged with “version 1.0” or “version 3.0.”
-
Query Optimization
-
Parallel Queries: Fire off both lexical and semantic queries in parallel.
-
Caching Strategy: Cache frequently accessed embeddings or popular queries to cut down on repeat computation.
-
Custom Ranking Scripts: If using advanced search engines like Elasticsearch, consider a custom ranking function that suits your domain (e.g., factoring in recency, user popularity, or domain authority).
Side Note – Choosing a Search Engine or Vector Database
Choose Traditional Search Engines + Vector Extensions When: Great if you need a blend of keyword and vector search and already have standard search infrastructure.
Choose Dedicated Vector Databases When: Ideal if you rely heavily on high-dimensional embeddings (e.g., multi-modal data that includes text, images, or audio) and require specialized vector operations at scale.
Step 4: Domain Expert Feedback with Iterative Quality Checks
Even the most sophisticated indexing strategy can fail if the content is outdated, incorrectly labelled, or inconsistently formatted. This is where domain experts become invaluable. Their iterative reviews and feedback help to build trust in the final system and ensure that only the most valuable and well-structured information is retained.
Practical Steps for Expert Review
-
Annotation Tooling: Set up a platform where experts can efficiently review documents, including their metadata, titles, and auto-generated summaries. The tool should make it easy to track reviews and aggregate feedback. For instance Argilla.
-
Expert Review: Have subject-matter experts label relevance (Yes/No), and correctness (Correct/Incorrect), and highlight any inconsistencies. This includes verifying that the automatically extracted or machine-generated summaries match the content.
-
Feedback Integration: Adjust the document corpus or the extraction/processing steps based on expert input. This might mean discarding outdated files, merging partial documents, or re-checking metadata fields.
Final Thoughts
Building an AI-ready knowledge base is not just about collecting documents; it’s about:
-
Making them discoverable through robust metadata and indexing,
-
Maintaining their accuracy via expert validation,
-
Ensuring their relevance by consistently refining and iterating on the content.
By diligently following Step 3 and Step 4, you’ll have a clean, well-organized, and highly accurate repository. This level of rigour ultimately sets you up for success in the remaining steps—enabling advanced testing, user-friendly interfaces, and continuous improvement. In short, these two steps build confidence not only within your technical teams but also among the end users and business stakeholders who rely on your knowledge base for critical information and decisions.
Ready to Dive Deeper? Stay tuned for Part 3, where we’ll put all these foundations to the test, explore user interface best practices, and cement a long-term improvement cycle to keep your AI-ready knowledge base running optimally!